Have you ever wanted to look at two players side by side and see how they tested when compared to one another? Does that new rookie your team drafted remind you of a player from yesteryear and you’re curious how they stack up to one another? Are you new to RAS and you want to see how different players stack up to one another for their Relative Athletic Score? Want to compare two players’ testing numbers head to head? Now you can do just that! Using the search options below, you can find any two players and compare them side by side.
The compare will default to the position of the first player you select, but you can choose a different position if you would like. The card is saved as an image, so if you want to share it all you have to do is right click it and copy image. As always you are free to share and use these cards at your discretion, provided you reference back to this site, my social media account, Mathbomb, and credit this tool’s creator, Eric Watkins. Note: As this head to head comparison is all time, individual player RAS will vary from the scores shown on their own page or the main menu for the site. It will, however, match their all time score.
Let us see your favorite head to head matchups!
RAS Comparison
| Brad Badger | Matt Slauson | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford - 1997 | H2H RAS As OG | Nebraska - 2009 | |||||
| Hand: | 8.39 | 9.04 | Hand: 9.625 | ||||
| Arm: | Arm: 35.5 | ||||||
| Height | 6043 | 7.30 | 9.11 | 6053 | Height | ||
| Weight | 296 | 1.77 | 6.58 | 313 | Weight | ||
| Bench | 21 | 3.56 | 5.08 | 23 | Bench | ||
| 40 yd dash | 5.22 | 7.46 | 6.72 | 5.26 | 40 yd dash | ||
| 20 split | 3.03 | 6.55 | 8.31 | 2.97 | 20 split | ||
| 10 split | 1.8 | 7.52 | 8.28 | 1.78 | 10 split | ||
| Vertical | 32.5 | 9.64 | 9.87 | 34 | Vertical | ||
| Broad | 903 | 9.45 | 9.28 | 902 | Broad | ||
| Shuttle | 4.13 | 10.00 | 4.52 | 4.86 | Shuttle | ||
| 3-Cone | 6.28 | 7.86 | 3-Cone | ||||
| RAS Comparison Card | @Mathbomb | ||||||
31 comments
-
-
I can’t get it to work correctly either.
-
I’ve literally never had a problem
-
-
A rarity when the sight works
-
Ive never had any problems with the site
-
Try the compare feature once ever, then
-
On it right now, runs fine
-
Works fine. I use it all the time
-
-
-
One of the best sites I’ve used. Great current and historical information. The ability to edit and adjust as new info comes in is very useful
-
Would you mind giving details as to the errors you encountered?
-
8/10 times when you fill out the player compare tool, instead of bringing up the player compare info, it brings you right back to two blank boxes.
-
Maybe you’re just scouting some bums.
-
Having the same issue – players won’t pop up in tool. Filling out manually and running compare just brings back to blank boxes. Even if inputting full college, position, etc. Tried for a bunch of OL and LBs.
-
You need to make sure that you are typing the school the way it wants you to. For example, North Dakota State will work but NDSU will not.
-
Better yet, just don’t enter the school. It will still work.
-
-
-
your spelling the names wrong
-
-
when I type in the player on a mobile browser, it RARELY gives me a a drop down to actually select them. So I can’t use it all on mobile
-
-
-
I have the same issue. Windows 7
-
I think I may understand what the issue is here. When you log on to the home page the database begins to download. I didn’t notice it and scrolled right past where the data would eventually be and clicked player compare which brought me to where the information would not be. My issue was solved by simply waiting for the data to populate on the home page.
-
I think it matters how far back you go. Enter Jerry Rice and get a blank. Enter Calvin Johnson and you get numbers, etc.
-
Rice came out in 1985, two years before this database reaches. The NFL started the combine officially on 1985, but it wasn’t until a few years later that it started publishing results, and even later than that in which results were published reliably.
-
-
Yep can’t get the comparison to work at all
-
It’s new, so we’re still working out the kinks. Try using just the player names first, only use the schools or positions if a different player with the same name shows up.
-
Good tip. Finally got it to work. Typed in Cole Strange on top and Chasen Hines on the bottom, did not input the school, and compared them as offensive guards.
You get an A for content but F for usability. Understandable, content is king. But now you really need to focus on make the data more accessible.
Suggestions
1 Don’t wipe out the user input, that’s nasty, early web stuff.
2 Get rid of the college input for now, since it’s not necessary in most cases for search.
3. Have auto-fill for the player name. It’s really worth it.
4. Why do you have to make the comparison work before anything else on the site works?
5. Actually this is the most import – when you click on your team coming into the site, don’t display a [table 43] where the content should be. 99% of users will leave the site after this.Again, great content. RAS is a new concept I just heard of recently and apparently the Patriots used it extensively in their draft. There’s a lot of interest in sites like this! But at this point it’s unusable for all but the most persistent. Good luck!
-
-
-
Site does not work for me. I’m very disappointed.
-
The site works just fine. 99% of the complaints are user issues.
– You need to spell the name correctly.
– Don’t put in the school.
– Use the drop down to put in the position.-
Nope that doesnt work either….
-
Who specifically are you attempting to compare on the page? If the player’s name is spelled correctly, meaning as it appears on the site, the actual code is pretty simplistic. If there’s an issue it should be easy to isolate and correct.
-
I’m 99% sure the issue is on mobile phones. On my laptop it works perfectly 100% of the time. On my phone dtopdowns don’t show up and even the actual tool on the main page doesn’t load.
-
-
-
Nope that doesn’t work either.
-
-
-
trying to compare
Jackson Powers-Johnson
Zach Fraziernot working
several attempts at others also. Frustrating
Site doesn’t work that well. Lots of glitches